From: “Paul Nanson”
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Hmmm. . . I wonder what “sooper sekrit handshake required lists” the Webbmeister has been reading:
http://tinyurl.com/6tqrl
Grace & peace,
Paul
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:32:11 -0600
From: Douglas Jordan
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
“[Waters] dared to point out that the fatal flaws in the Uberbishop’s theology. . . . I just find myself slightly amazed that anyone could find themselves theologically opposed to someone like Sinclair Ferguson and assume that its because he isn’t bright enough to understand what Tom Wright is saying.”
Fatal flaws? And then mentioning Ferguson? I guess Webb didn’t make it to the WTS Dallas New Perspective Discussion, where Sinclair made it very clear that he considered this debate an “argument among brothers.” Maybe since that time, Sinclair has decided that he doesn’t consider NTW a Christian brother, but I don’t think so. . . .
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:36:06 -0500
From: “Owen, Paul”
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
I have read Guy Waters’ book, and while he makes some decent points, his critiques are often aimed at straw men. I recently wrote an informal five-part review of his book in the form of an open letter over at reformedcatholicism.com, which can be found in the archives. I certainly hope that people aren’t gullible enough to take Waters’ book as some sort of final word on the matter.
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:55:55 -0600
From: Mark Horne
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Thank you for giving me a second witness on this, Doug. I had heard a similar story but the lectures weren’t taped.
I wonder if this is a new slogan from the LPS. I saw ReformedCatholicism.org accused of “bashing” Sinclair Ferguson as a general trait. I searched the site and could only find one time where I expressed some disagreement with him. I have to wonder if these people work themselves up along certain lines in private and then come out with fantastic accusations.
Mark
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:37:39 GMT
From: “Joe Thacker”
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Paul, or anyone else that might know the answer to this,
Is the Warfield list set up like the BH List? The reason I ask is because I followed a link on your post and was able to access Warfield List messages — all I had to do was sign in with my Yahoo ID. I’m not a member, so I can’t access the Members only section, but it looks like I could read posts whenever I wanted to.
What prevents someone with a Yahoo ID from doing the same in relation to the BH List? Is our list as private as we think?
Curiously,
JAT
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:42:32 -0000
From: “garver”
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Joe Thacker wrote:
What prevents someone with a Yahoo ID from doing the same in relation to the BH List? Is our list as private as we think?
There are several different levels of “privacy” settings you can set in yahoogroups. BH is private to the max, while BBWarfield allows reading, but not posting, by outsiders.
joel
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:46:47 -0600
From: “Paul Nanson”
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
The BH list archives are private (members only). The Warfield archives are public.
Paul
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:51:21 GMT
From: “Joe Thacker”
Subject: Re: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Paul,
I figured as much, but I just wanted to be sure.
Thanks.
JAT
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:56:57 -0600
From: burke
Subject: Still crazy after all these years. . .
Bummers, man. I thought maybe the Anti-Christ was reading our messages, us unawares, and was using them to begin his reign of terror, thereby hastening the end.
Back to my sermon. No excitement here (except for SW),
Bukre
